I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. thank you for that great review and also the explanations. I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. Mr Ericsson makes a very good point, and to go and dig irrelevant background info on him to discredit him is just well THAT is trolling. Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. I know taste is subjective, but it seems to me that some people have become obsessed with blur and bokeh. From my experience, the toughest test on a lense is its ability to function wide open. sigh, overdone bokeh and centre sharpness bear little relevance to the art of this hobby. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. Very sharp even at f2, build quality, price, weight, autofocus is fast, bokeh, No IS, flare, autofocus isn't quite as consistent as some newer lenses, focus speed, image quality, predictability, Image quality, build like a tank, focus ring, weight. I also find the other photos not very good. Everyone should have one? Beware others critical comments here about how flat these images look, the author has chosen specific topics and viewpoints to highlight f2 with this lens, so see the wow review for what it is please and the negative comments need placing in context. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. wew.. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. The full extent of the relationship between Rokinon and Samyang is unknown to me, but the packaging on my lens says Technology by Samyang Optics. OM System's latest lens is a whopper of a macro, featuring optical stabilization, full weather sealing, up to 2x magnification and a whole lot more. the lens is built strong, very strong. Depth of field at f/2 on the 135 is so shallow that I usually shot it stopped down to f/2.8 or f/4 anyway. For example, the legendary Canon 85mm F1.2L weighs in at 1025g, and the Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art isn't too light either at 1130g. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens. I do know, however, that I can take an equally framed photo I've shot with my Canon kit lens, both zoomed to 100% I run circles around this guy. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 Image quality, weight and value for money. But you just know that there is the professionalism that is lacking here -- and the writer's Instagram page confirms that. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? Several days ago another member posted a stunning telephoto image of the Snake Nebula, Barnard 72, taken with a Canon lens which costs $12,000. At $900 US it a relative steal. http://www.idyll.com/laneysat Especially for beginning astrophotographers, who should first invest most of their finances into a good telescope mount, telephoto lenses are an excellent and affordable solution. The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot. There have been a lot of Tele-Tessars over the years. I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. When stopped down to 49mm it really is indistinguishable from an APO, except it shows red chromatic aberration with modified cameras even with the UV/IR block or CLS-CCD filter. Lagoon and Trifid wide field IC1396 nebula in Cepheus - wide field image. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 4th, 2006 As the reader reviews below testify, this is an absolutely stellar lens, probably one of the sharpest and most distortion-free that Canon makes. Also, I used to have a Nikon 180/2.8 ED IF AF and 300/4 ED IF AF. These include canon lens for night photography along with good budget lenses for astrophotography. if you really want to get the best gym photos that can be taken, use it and enjoy what you will see. I cant decide whether to clean it up in processing or let it be. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC is one of the most affordable and practical lenses for astrophotography on the market. Has a good weight to it. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Do you expect me to gawk? And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Perhaps it's not a big thing, but for a L-graded lens this feature should be expected. Also, when shooting the heart nebula, is the sky tracker a must or not required? These lenses can be had on eBay in mint condition for around $70, and are probably the most price efficient optical instrument in the world. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. However, they can be perfectly corrected with narrow band H-alpha or OIII filters. 135 mm. But I sold it and went back to using a 70-200 (alongside a 24-70). Lots of wet blankets around here. How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. You may need to stop down to control star bloat, and thats exactly what Ive done with this 135. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? I was very happy for this reason to eventually get a full frame DSLR in 2007 and sell the 85mm lens and buy a 105mm one to replace it. Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses. Yes the Samyang is good and yes there are lenses with bad bokeh. This lens is one of canons finest lenses i have ever used. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. Neutral yet very nice colours. There is no doubt that the 135L deserves it excellent reputation for image quality. Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. To remedy this, I reduced the star size in post, and I started shooting at F/4 to really tighten things up. Trully sharp accross whole frame from f2 on 5d. Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. Smooth but contrasty. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. Preaching to the choir! Not another article that promotes portraits shot with wide open lens and out of focus highlights in the background. You're sour grapes man, you wish it were you who wrote the article. I've seen several listed but here are more to consider. As a complete beginner in Astrophotography should I buy Rokinon 135mm lens or Canon EF 75-300mm lens with Canon EF 50mm lens? On a full frame body, I rely upon this lens and it does not disappoint. I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. But If you want the "look" you get with a medium telephoto at f/2, hen all those negatives become irrelevant. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. Show some humility and don't troll. It's a technical review about a couple of lens attributes. The extremes are 2 and 22. We always expect to see some drop in performance (particularly corner sharpness) when we move from testing on a sub-frame to a full-frame camera, but the 135mm f/2L turned in a really remarkable performance even at full-frame. Probably you could get a very similar image with a 85mm 1.8. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Canon 60Da DSLR and Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L2 lens at 135mm, f/3.2. Never before (nor after) have I seen a lens with this level of sharpness wide open. I hope that this post has provided some practical insight into a popular camera lens for astrophotography. Are you really using 135 a lot? Several functions may not work. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. I used Canon's 135 f/2 for ten years. So there - it is not a perfect object. never mind.. confirmed from others that F19 is indeed the one that is excluded on this lens! I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009 Manually focusing a lens for astrophotography is nothing new, but the manual aperture ring adjustments may feel a little strange at first. Unfortunately I haven't more the Canon lens. It's bokeh is comparable to the 85mm 1.2 but IMO not as nice. Overall, spectacular lens. it is crisp, fast, and awsome. The Heart and Soul Nebulae captured using a DSLR and the Rokinon 135mm lens. Its a no brainer if you use this focal length. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. 1. The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. $449.00. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. [emailprotected]. About 3 hours of exposures split between Narrowband, Broadband and short exposure shots to make an HDR image. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! Would you recommend a collar/support for the lens? Does this work well with any of the 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.0x Teleconverters (extenders / barlows)? The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. One of them is simplicity: A clear, simple subject that constitutes a shape, standing out and contrasting against a calm and simple background. you can see here a lot of photos mostly shot with the f/4 version. While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. (purchased for $900). Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. One of Canon's best lenses for a reasonable price. With this lens you don't need to do much if any post processing. The aperture ring is marked with each f-stop, and you need to manually click through F/2 F/22 and watch the blades do their work. As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. When I was teaching photography in 70's at a junior college, I critiqued students photos, but I never did so harshly. One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 $399 00. Sure, if you scroll through his page there are quite a few lens tests on starshttps://www.flickr.chotos/ytoropin/, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, Article: The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography, This is not recommended for shared computers, Review of Explore Scientific First Light 8, COUNTING SUNSPOTS WITH A $10 OPTICAL TUBE ASSEMBLY, Hubble Optics 14 inch Dobsonian - Part 2: The SiTech GoTo system, iStar Opticals Phantom FCL 140-6.5 review. It focuses within a blink of an eye, instantly. Voting ends March 8, 2023. Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 14th, 2006 Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. I seems many people he are confused about the meaning of the word. A con is that it really makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. The lens is not weather-sealed, so you definitely dont want to leave your camera and lens (and your tracking mount!) The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. This thing is a beast in comparison. The 5D's larger pixels also make chromatic aberration somewhat lower at most apertures. This way the focus will favor the red light which is more objectionable within a star image than a bit of blue. The lens is available on eBay for around $200. She's cold? Just like the above samples, most are just bad. BirdDog P240 40X NDI PTZ Camera. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. You currently have javascript disabled. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. Sharp wide open, wonderful bokeh, fast AF in dark conditions. Its actually kind of neat to watch! Interesting that ancient, low-tech (no ED glass, no special coatings) non-apo telephotos could produce decent results compared to something modern. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. From far to near, the AF is instantaneous. Nothing just makes sense about the review -- the writer does not really understand the lens he is reviewing, very basic concepts are wrong.
One Hazard Associated With Driving Downhill Is:, Classified Appreciation Week 2020 Ideas, Madison Middle School Staff Directory, Bill Cunningham Show Website, Elka Walker Real World Now, Articles C